Litigation & Enforcement Highlights
Arkansas Revolutionary PBM Legislation Comes Under Fire
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor July 25, 2025
Update: On Monday, July 28, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Brian Miller issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law (which would have taken effect on January 1, 2026) until the federal court issues final judgement. In April 2025, Arkansas passed legislation prohibiting pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from acquiring or holding a direct or indirect interest in pharmacies. This law makes Arkansas the first state to enact a structural approach to address concerns about PBM business practices. To date, three separate lawsuits have been filed challenging the law. This article looks […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Oregon’s Powerful Healthcare Merger Review Law Survives Legal Challenge
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor July 11, 2025
On July 3, 2025, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an Oregon state law that allows the state to review, approve or deny proposed health care mergers, affirming a lower court ruling from May of last year. History of the Case The Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems (OAHHS – a trade association representing Oregon hospitals and health systems) originally filed suit in Federal District Court October 2022 challenging the constitutionality of an Oregon law enacted in 2021, that required health care entities […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Fiduciary Responsibilities of Health Plan Administrator Come Under Question
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor June 17, 2025
On May 21, 2025, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio reversed a lower court’s decision to dismiss a case filed by Tiara Yachts against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). The rulings hinged on whether BCBSM acted as an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary when administering Tiara Yachts’ self-funded insurance plan. The lower Court had ruled that BCBSM’s actions did not qualify as fiduciary conduct under ERISA, claiming that the case was a contractual dispute as the complaint was covered by […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Settlement Limits Employer’s Suit Against Third-Party Administrator
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor May 15, 2025
On November 18, 2024, Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI), a business that sponsors a self-funded healthcare plan for its employees, filed suit against Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, in its role as third-party administrator (TPA), claiming Anthem withheld information and engaged in financial misconduct, and challenging the function of the BlueCard program. On April 22, 2025, Chief U.S. District Judge R. David Proctor issued an injunction stopping the case due to the settlement terms of a previous class action antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS). Lawsuits like the […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Chaos at the FTC as Lack of Commissioners Temporarily Freezes Price Fixing Case Against Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor April 16, 2025
On April 1, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed for a stay in a case against three Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), not because of any lack of evidence, but rather because there was no one left at the FTC to pursue the case due to recent firings by the current administration. When the suit was filed, it was supported by the three Democrat Commissioners, and the two Republican Commissioners recused themselves. A last-minute reversal of a previous recusal may have put the suit back into motion, but the entire […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Trump Administration Continues Federal Antitrust Activity
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor March 15, 2025
Department of Justice Looking Into United Health On February 21, 2025, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a civil fraud investigation against UnitedHealth. The investigation is centered on Medicare billing practices, with sources saying that UnitedHealth-employed physicians were trained to document higher revenue-generating diagnoses, even if that was not what patients were being treated for. Additionally, the investigation is apparently looking into claims that UnitedHealth used software to suggest additional codes and offered bonuses to clinicians who coded for these additional diagnoses. If […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Aetna Suit Against Radiology Partners Has Implications for the No Surprises Act
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor February 17, 2025
On December 23, 2024, Aetna (part of CVS Health) filed a lawsuit against Radiology Partners and its private equity backers in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida – Jacksonville Division. The suit claims Radiology Partners, one of the nation’s largest imaging groups, manipulated the No Surprises Act (NSA) and its dispute resolution process to boost payments improperly. Aetna’s filing called this a “multiphase healthcare fraud scheme” that defrauded Aetna of “tens of millions” of dollars. Update: On February 25, Radiology Partners filed two motions: one to […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Recent Lawsuits Question HRSA Oversight of the 340B Program
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor January 15, 2025
In November of 2024, three lawsuits were filed by pharmaceutical manufacturers against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), challenging how HRSA oversees the Federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. (HRSA is the sub-agency within HHS that administers the 340B Program). The potential impact of the lawsuits on the 340B Program is significant in its own right, but the outcome of the lawsuits could also have an indirect effect on merger and acquisition activity. Research has indicated that the merger and acquisition […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Antitrust in Transition: Trump’s Potential Impact on Healthcare Oversight
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor December 16, 2024
Healthcare market oversight at the federal level is primarily done through litigation brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ). Any change in administration in Washington will change the focus and priority of these agencies. Nonetheless, the second Trump administration has indicated that it will make wholesale changes to federal agencies, including the FTC and DOJ, that exceed those that are typical during a change in administration. These indications raise many questions about the new role of the FTC and DOJ in healthcare markets: How […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses Certificate of Need Challenge
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor November 14, 2024
On October 18, 2024, the North Carolina Supreme Court unanimously ruled to send a case challenging the states Certificate of Need (CON) law back to a lower court. Certificate of Need laws require healthcare providers and facilities to get permission from the state government before adding or expanding healthcare services, equipment, or facilities. To get this permission, the provider must show that the new service is needed, hence the name. The case in North Carolina originated in April 2020 when Dr. Jay Singleton, an eye surgeon, filed suit against legislative […]
Continue Reading Download PDF