Issue Brief
The Source Team Co-Authors Research Article Examining Impacts of Cross-Market Hospital Mergers
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor April 23, 2024
A new research article examining the impact of “cross-market” hospital mergers on prices and quality published in Health Services Research has been co-authored by The Source’s own Jaime King, Katherine Gudiksen, Alexandra Montague, and Thomas Greaney, along with our long-time collaborators, Daniel Arnold, Brent Fulton, and Richard Scheffler, from The Petris Center at UC Berkeley. The study is the first to measure the impact of cross-market hospital acquisitions on quality and the first to identify price effects from multiple cross-market acquisitions (i.e. serial acquisitions). The study used commercial claims data […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
The Source Team Examines Changes to the Final 2023 Merger Guidelines
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor February 26, 2024
For Health Affairs Forefront, the Source’s Katherine Gudiksen and Jaime King have analyzed changes from the draft version to the final 2023 Merger Guidelines released by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ). In a previous Health Affairs Forefront piece, Source staff examined the draft guidelines. This new post examines key elements of the new guidelines, concluding that while the final version better aligns the Guidelines with the underlying antitrust laws and caselaw, the Guidelines create more grey area for companies to demonstrate that mergers do not […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Source Team Analyzes Importance of New Merger Guidelines for Health Affairs Forefront
Bruce Allain, Managing Editor December 13, 2023
In a new piece published in Health Affairs Forefront titled “How Will the New Draft Merger Guidelines Impact Health Care Markets?”, The Source’s Amy Gu, Katherine Gudiksen, and Jaime King examine new draft Merger Guidelines released by the Federal Trade Commissions and Department of Justice building on a previous executive order intended to strengthen competition and enhance antitrust enforcement. The authors analyze the new guidelines, as well as the harms caused by health care consolidation. The piece concludes that the draft merger guidelines break new ground by addressing the increasingly […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Just Published: Research Report on State-imposed Conditions on Healthcare Provider Transactions
Amy Y. Gu, Managing Editor August 16, 2023
In a new research paper published in Frontiers in Public Health Volume 11, The Source’s Alex Montague, Robin Davison, Katie Gudiksen, and Jaime King examine the use of conditional approvals by state officials on hospital and health system mergers, acquisitions, and other consolidating transactions. While federal antitrust enforcers play an important role in overseeing large mergers, acquisitions, and other consolidating transactions of major healthcare providers, state oversight over healthcare markets is essential to slow consolidation more broadly and address market failures across the country. One method states have used to address […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
[Case Brief] AAEM-PG v. Envision Healthcare: Corporate Practice of Medicine Challenges Private Equity Acquisition in Health Care
Mary Mitchell, Student Fellow August 15, 2023
As private equity (PE) investment in healthcare draws scrutiny from advocates and regulators, one lawsuit has been in the spotlight as a potentially important precedent-setter, particularly regarding its corporate practice of medicine (CPOM) claims: American Academy of Emergency Medicine Physician Group (AAEM-PG) v. Envision Healthcare. The Independent Emergency Physicians Consortium called this case a “momentous event” that could signal an inflection point in the increasing corporatization of medicine.[1] However, proceedings have been on pause since May 2023, when the defendant filed for bankruptcy, and it is unclear if and when […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
[Case Brief] Sidibe v. Sutter Health: The Oldest Chapter in the Sutter Antitrust Saga Sees New Light for Class Plaintiffs
Amy Y. Gu, Managing Editor May 17, 2021
See case page: Sidibe v. Sutter Health As all eyes were fixated on UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust v. Sutter Health (UEBT), the landmark state antitrust lawsuit that the California attorney general brought against Sutter Health, another long-standing litigation against Sutter in federal court for similar claims has largely gone under the radar. With the final judgment in the state action set to be approved in state court this July, we turn our attention to Sidibe v. Sutter Health, the other case to watch in the ongoing antitrust challenge against […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
[Issue Brief] State Surprise Billing Protections: Are States Making the Grade for Patients?
Ada Shao, Student Fellow January 15, 2021
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the issue of health care affordability in the United States. According to a Pew Research Center study, since the pandemic began, 25% of adults have had trouble paying bills, with 11% having particular difficulty in affording medical care. Lower income Americans face an even more dire situation, with 46% having had trouble paying bills and 19% unable to afford medical care. Already stretched thin by the pandemic, the last thing Americans across the country need is to open their mailboxes to find an unexpected […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
[Case Brief] Atrium Health Settlement Encourages Enforcement of Anti-tiering/Anti-steering Clauses in Healthcare Contracts
Amy Y. Gu, Managing Editor November 16, 2020
Editor’s Note: An abbreviated summary of this case appears in the research report “Preventing Anticompetitive Contracting Practices in Healthcare Markets”, which provides a detailed analysis of anti-tiering/anti-steering clauses, including economic justification and procompetitive use and states that have restricted its use in healthcare contracts. The antitrust case against Sutter Health in California has drawn the attention of state regulators and policymakers across the country, spawning legislative reform efforts to curb dominant hospitals’ market power. Prior to this, an enforcement action against Atrium Health, a large health system on the […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
How the United States Can Use Telehealth Expansion to Achieve Market Savings
Kendall Kohlmeyer, Student Fellow October 2, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid expansion of telehealth services. This has led the federal government and many states to expand insurance coverage for telehealth services through emergency waivers of certain requirements. Implemented ideally, widespread telehealth use could lower the overall cost of health care in commercial markets by lowering per-patient and per-visit costs for specialty and primary care providers, while increasing patient satisfaction and quality of care. However, if done poorly, telehealth expansion could increase healthcare costs by providing easy access to care that is unlikely to improve health […]
Continue Reading Download PDF
Just Published: Research Report on Preventing Anticompetitive Contracting Practices in Healthcare Markets
Amy Y. Gu, Managing Editor September 8, 2020
As unrelenting consolidation in healthcare provider and insurer markets continues, policymakers need additional options to protect the public from escalating healthcare prices and low-quality care. High healthcare prices result from multiple factors, including third-party payers dampening consumers’ price sensitivity, patients and providers demanding expensive healthcare technologies, and healthcare markets consolidating. While these factors are visible, dominant insurers and healthcare providers can also use terms in their insurer-provider contracts in anticompetitive ways that thwart competition and lead to higher prices or lower quality but remain hidden from public view. With support […]
Continue Reading Download PDF