Idaho has been active in antitrust enforcement, as the Idaho Attorney General joined with the FTC to challenge the acquisition of Idaho’s largest independent, multi-speciality physician group by St. Luke’s Health System. In that case, the Ninth Circuit held that the acquisition violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Idaho Competition Act.
In the most recent legislative term, Idaho proposed by did not pass healthcare transparency legislation that would have required health insurers on the state’s ACA exchange to disclose a range of specific information. Idaho also current has a ban on most favored nation clauses. A most favored nations clause is an agreement between a payer (such as an insurance company) and a provider that typically requires a provider to give the payer the lowest rate that it gave to any other comparable payer, which can be anticompetitive by encouraging oligopolistic pricing by large payers and increasing barriers for new entrants.
Idaho’s regular legislative session has ended for 2017.
Recent Legislative Developments
|AN ACT MAKING CERTAIN HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE INFORMATION AVAILABLE: would require the health insurers on the Idaho Exchange to make available the following information: (i) prescription drugs covered by the plan, including restrictions on use or quantity; (ii) out-of-pocket expenses; (iii) network providers; (iv) coverage for out-of-network providers; (v) rights of appeal when coverage is denied; and (iv) other information deemed pertinent by the Exchange.||Inactive — Died.|
- None identified.
- None identified.
We compile state statutes relate to healthcare price and competition, including healthcare transparency, markets, and costs. For a complete listing of all health related statutes visit the State Health Practice Database for Research.
Transparency in Healthcare
- Idaho Code Ann. § 56-1054 creates a Health Quality Planning Commission within the Department of Health and Welfare to promote improved quality of care and improved health outcomes “through investment in health information technology and in patient safety and quality initiatives in the state of Ohio.” The Commission is charged with monitoring the Idaho Health Data Exchange, which facilitates clinical sharing of patient information between providers. The Commission is also recommending the creation of a hospital discharge database and an APCD (see below).
- Idaho Code Ann. § 41-3443 prohibits most favored nation clauses, or clauses having a similar effect, in an agreement between an insurance carrier and a participating provider. A most favored nations clause is an agreement between a payer (such as an insurance company) and a provider that typically requires a provider to give the payer the lowest rate that it gave to any other comparable payer, which can be anticompetitive by encouraging oligopolistic pricing by large payers and increasing barriers for new entrants.
- Idaho Code Ann. § 39-4903 permits the state attorney general to authorize cooperative agreements between health care providers by issuing a “certificate of public advantage” if the “likely benefits resulting from the agreements outweigh the disadvantages attributable to a reduction in competition that may result from such agreements.”
- Idaho Code Ann. § 56-263 directs the Department of Health and Welfare to present a plan for Medicaid managed care geared towards high-cost populations to sixty-first Idaho legislature (2011). The plan is to include, among other things, improved coordination of care through primary care medical homes, contracts based on risk-sharing or capitated payments, and the elimination of duplicative practices that result in unnecessary utilization and costs.
- The Idaho Competition Act can be found at Idaho Code Ann. § 48-01 et seq.
FY 2018 BUDGET
The fiscal year runs from July 1 to June 30. To view Idaho’s FY 2018 spending on health programs, click here.
- In February 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a district court opinion finding that the acquisition of Idaho’s largest independent, multi-speciality physician group by St. Luke’s Health System violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Idaho Competition Act. The FTC and the Idaho Attorney General filed a complaint against St. Luke’s in March 2013, alleging that the acquisition would create a dominant single provider of adult primary care physicians in the Nampa, Idaho area, with almost 60 percent market share. For details, read the Source’s case summary and Blog post.